Admin+ Action Plan (APAP)
Hello Arcatorians! In light of the recent quittings, Dweson, Pig, Mal, and I (the only remaining staff other than Josh, who wasn't online at the time of the meeting -- apologies, Josh) have decided on an Admin+ Action Plan.
Apologies to anyone that is offended in not getting the spot, but after discussion amongst the staff, we have decided who the two new Admin+s will be. They will be test subjects. We are promoting them to see how well they do with such responsibility and see if they are right. If not, they will obviously be demoted and someone else will be chosen. If you are not chosen, do not feel offended, you still have a chance. If you are chosen and do not keep the spot, do not feel offended, you should be honored that you were a first pick.
The two lucky first picks to be test subjects are _ONLYUSEmeBOW and The_Untitled1.
Remember that this is not only about ban count. We want to see you take a positive role in the community and be a leader. Now give them a big round of applause, and remember: if you weren't chosen, don't quit just yet! You still have a chance at the spot if the current subjects FAIL!
Also, a message to all Builder+s and Mods: This will open up a lot of spots. We already have a few people in mind for Mod/Admin spots, but that is subject to change. The first of many new staff members is konohashadow, who everyone agrees is incredibly deserving of a Moderator position.
Good luck everyone!
- Banana937's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Yeah, Kono deserves his Mod spot more than any other mod on here (including myself)
Good luck Thom & Aston 
This is a true as true ness could get.
Quittings. Such a harsh word. Resignations is much nicer...
I feel like this is a weird situation. Admin+'s should be picked clearly b/c of their dedication, and shouldn't need a second thought to be promoted. When you said test subjects, it made me think about how you *NEEDED* test subjects as an Admin+. Isn't that a tad risky? Shouldn't you be 100% okay with who you pick, and NOT need to worry about them???
I feel like this is a weird situation. Admin+'s should be picked clearly b/c of their dedication, and shouldn't need a second thought to be promoted. When you said test subjects, it made me think about how you *NEEDED* test subjects as an Admin+. Isn't that a tad risky? Shouldn't you be 100% okay with who you pick, and NOT need to worry about them???
Exactly, you are lowering the value of the admin+ tag with this.
Exactly, you are lowering the value of the admin+ tag with this.
"Oh, I think you're good enough, but let's throw you in and see hoe it works"
"Oh, I think you're good enough, but let's throw you in and see hoe it works"
Yah, the rank is going to go downhill and we will just need a new rank for prestigious admins. It will be called Dweson...
DER CAN BE ONLY ONE!!!
Yah, the rank is going to go downhill and we will just need a new rank for prestigious admins. It will be called Dweson...
No one's going to be able to be that good though. It would throw off the curve....
You guys can hardly talk, having completely left your positions of power...
loljk. I understand what you mean, but historically we have always tested out the Admin+ position by running a little trial. You can't really tell how someone will use their position without seeing them use it, so...
kysanchez should get a shot at Admin+ btw, if he doesn't you all suck 
Also:
skebby 4 admin+ 2013!






Good lucky, Untitled and Only!
Also, I agree that Kono deserves Moderator.